• About
  • History Writings

Water and Me

Water and Me

Tag Archives: HISTORY

Dam Jam 2016

19 Friday Aug 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, Hiking, water history

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Baltimore, DPW, engineering, FILTRATION, Gunpowder Falls, Hiking, HISTORY, Montebello, Public Works, water, water history

Happening tomorrow! Loch Raven is nice but I liked the one at Prettyboy Dam a couple years ago, only because I got to go to the bottom-insides of that dam.

 

You will get to walk out here. This use to be open all the time, now only open to the public on special occasions.

Ask your tour guide who is responsible for closing these gates during the 100 year storm?? Enquiring minds want to know!

Looking upstreams from the old dam to the new.

This is what it looked like after the storm of 2011. Lots of water going over the crest.

This is the 1880 dam during the same storm.

KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

There will be tours of the lime kilns by Jim Kelly, who will be giving away copies of my book (Might as well give them away – nobody buys them anymore!) (That’s ok, a good cause) This photo was from 2006

Volunteers started clearing the weeds back in 2011.

P1070168

Jim and company have had a lot of work done to the kilns. He will be giving a presentation on the 3 different kilns, talking about their history.

He will also be talking about this house, which has been restored.

PP236.1693A Loch Raven. Balancing reservoir. Throwing shaft over

Thom Grizzard will be giving a tour of this area. Where the old balancing reservoir and shaft are. No sense in bringing your bathing suit – it no longer looks like this. It is grown over. The volunteers have cleared a lot of the trails around here – making exploration of Cromwell Valley Park a lot of fun!

A Dumpster Fire by any other name….

10 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, water history

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Baltimore, FILTRATION, Fire, garbage, HISTORY, Montebello, Public Works, water history

…is not just a fire, especially when there are historic records involved…or HAZMAT…or combustibles, like lime.

We are used to having dumpster fires here at work. Over the years they have become few and far between. Most people know not to throw unslaked pebble lime into the dumpster. We have a special area for that. But, every once in a while a new employee or some one forgets and viola! Fire. For those who don’t know, lime will heat up when mixed with water. It gets very hot – hot enough to melt plastic and then cause paper items to ignite. Lime is used in water treatment for ph and it coats the pipes throughout the system, so things like lead don’t leach into your drinking water. It was originally used as a disinfectant in the water system, replaced by chlorine.

006

Anyway, back to the title of this post – maybe a dumpster fire should be a felony? Or at least be considered criminal negligence? As the firemen were pulling out the burning debris, I couldn’t help but notice some brown folders thrown into the mix. As the folders looked familiar, like historical records, I pulled a couple out. Shit!!! They are ‘As Built Drawings’ from the mid 1920’s! Drawings of one of the two water filtration plants! Shit!! It is unbelievable that someone would throw this stuff into a dumpster!

The City has a policy on what to do with old records. You send them to the City Archives. A couple months ago an employee from the Finance Dept. downtown called me and said that as he was walking by the recycle bin he noticed an old rolled up drawing. He wanted to know if I wanted it? Sure! Well when I received it, it turned out to be a profile drawing of the work schedule during the building of the Loch Raven Tunnel – dated 1875 – 1881! It is about 20 feet long on cloth paper, drawn in color. Unbelievable!! (I know, I keep saying ‘unbelievable’ but actually it is not. After 35 years here, every stupid thing people do is very much believable!)

007

Not only were there historical documents in the dumpster, someone threw in some air cylinders, aerosol cans (2 of which exploded) and God only knows what else! And to top it all off, one of the employees wanted to climb up on the dumpster and try to put the fire out with an extinguisher! Really? Another wanted to stand on the front end loader bucket, hold a fire hose and try to extinguish it. God created firemen for a reason – let them do their job!

And the Rains Came

02 Tuesday Aug 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, Hiking, kayaking

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Baltimore, Baltimore County, HISTORY, kayaking, Monuments, Public Works, Rec and Parks, Rivers

We went out for a bit on Saturday night, during the down-pour. We knew it was raining hard and steady but had no idea of the amount of rain. Loch Raven Dam is back to overflowing and I would imagine the other two reservoirs are full as well. It will take a lot of citizen usage and lack of rainfall, for quite a few months, to head us into a drought situation.
On Sunday morning we decided to head out, search and find new places to put our kayaks in. Hot and steamy in Baltimore, but still a nice day to explore new places. Neither one of us had seen the news yet.
Our first stop was at Broening Park, which I always thought was called Middlebranch Park. According to Google maps, Broening is DNR property and Middlebranch is City of Baltimore, Rec and Parks property. They are divided by the Hanover Street Bridge.
Not until we got back home and turned on the news did we realize that all that debris and mud we saw was remnants of last night’s storm, washing away Ellicott City.

5

Hanover Street Bridge from Broening Park

10

No way am I putting my kayak in there.

12

The garbage and debris didn’t stop these guys

14

Under the Hanover St bridge.

29

After a short stroll, we headed to the Southwest Boat Launch. This is Baltimore County’s property on the Patapsco River.

32

The river rose and covered the trail bridge with mud…

30

Hard to see in this photo but the water where the SW branch and the Patapsco meet is moving way too fast. We are quiet, peaceful-waters kayakers. Too much work here, dodging all the debris out there. Like I said, at this time we were unaware of the damage done upstream of here.

39

Along the path between the SW Boat Ramp and the Model Airplane Club we came across this marker, which someone removed the plaque from. I wrote to Baltimore County Rec and Parks and asked what was there – no response.

Baltimore Droughts – a brief history

27 Wednesday Jul 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, Reservoir, water history

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Baltimore, engineering, FILTRATION, Gunpowder Falls, HISTORY, Lake Montebello, Montebello, POLITICS, Public Works, water, water history

I have been asked numerous questions and for information on what is the procedure for the water plant, in dealing with drought scenarios? All new bosses asking. There are a lot of procedures that will need to be followed, so I will be updating the information I have collected over the years, all the different ways to keep Baltimore drinking water flowing. To be brief, when the reservoir at Loch Raven gets below an elevation of 235′, a decision will need to be made – Open gates at Prettyboy Dam, start low lift pumps, and/or introduce water from the Susquehanna River. Right now the 3 reservoirs are only about 1-2′ below normal. In most cases, when Prettyboy and Loch Raven drop, the pumps from the Susquehanna are used instead of our Low Lift Pumps. Here is a brief history:

1869 – 1870 – The City suffers a severe drought in the summers. It was concluded that the Jones’ Falls water supply was not sufficient for the future. After an investigation for a future water source, it was decided the source would be the Gunpowder Falls. Noting that due to the severe drought of this past year (1869), Engineers Curran and Martin went to the Great Gunpowder Falls to gauge its flow. In twenty-four hours, one hundred and sixty four million plus gallons flowed, which is twenty times more than the present supply. Following the drought was a heavy rain in October, during the farmers’ plowing of their fields. The runoff caused Druid Lake to be too muddy for the consumer. It was not fit for use for twenty-six days.
1872 – Notwithstanding the confident assertions and opinions of the advocates of the Jones’ Falls supply that there would be no want of water at any time after its introduction, in the severe drought of 1872 it became apparent that unless the Gunpowder was resorted to, Baltimore would encounter the risk of a water famine in every dry summer.
1877 – The temporary supply pumps (on the Gunpowder) were needed this year due to a drought.
1896 – Long drought.
1900 – There was a drought condition during the year. This was the first recorded drought during the use of Loch Raven water. The drought was referred to when the water consumption exceeded the total flow of the Gunpowder River. “An unusually severe drought occurred and the city escaped a water famine by the narrowest margin”
1910 – Worst drought, only 418 million gallons left in reserve storage, depleted 1.06 billion gallons of reserve storage. The year 1910 recorded the second drought since the City began using Loch Raven water as a water source.
1911 – Due to drought, wooden flash boards were placed at the dam at Loch Raven and at the Waste Weirs at Lake Montebello and Lake Clifton in order to increase the storage capacity at each location by three to six feet in depth. (This is prior to the new dam being built in 1915)

Drought lochraven2

Drought LochRaven 5-17

The top photo shows the baffle boards on the original 1881 dam. The second photo shows that up until 1917 they still used the boards, this time on the second dam.

1914 – Recorded the third drought since the City began using Loch Raven. The average daily water consumption for the year 1914 was 72.677 million gallons. It was estimated the total population supplied was 593,000.
1929 – 1930 – There was a long continued drought this year with occasional spells of unusually hot weather. The lack of rainfall had actually begun in 1929. As of December 31, the Loch Raven Dam was at an elevation of 227.2 feet A.M.T. (Normal is 240’) The typhoid death rate had risen to 3.3 per 100,000. Because the typhoid death rate was rising in most of the eastern states, it was concluded that the prolonged drought was the contributing factor. As a result of the long drought, low flow of the Gunpowder River, and the depletion of the Loch Raven Reservoir, the Water Department decided to reclaim the water used for washing filters. It was estimated that 2,000,000 gallons of water could be saved each day. The water was pumped from the washwater reservoir and pumped into the raw water supply tunnel through the surge tank. (This building is still there, covered in overgrowth, pumps having been removed years ago).
1931 – The drought continued through the year 1931. As of December 31, 1931 the water level at the Loch Raven Dam was 15.5 feet below the crest which is 2.7 feet lower than at the beginning of the year.
1932 – The drought which started in July 1930 and continued through the entire year of 1931 came to an end in 1932. By May 14, 1932 the water finally ran over the crest of the dam at Loch Raven; and, on May 15 the water restrictions on the public were removed. On May 14 when the water started overflowing the crest at the dam, the preparation plans to use an emergency water supply and filtration plant at Avalon was discontinued. At Montebello, the emergency pump that was used to recycle washwater by discharging the washwater back into the raw water tunnel was discontinued when the water flowed over the dam.
1941 – There was a prolonged drought which caused a great drop in the Loch Raven Reservoir. It was then necessary to open the valve at the Prettyboy Reservoir (Dam crest elevation 520’). This was the first time that it was necessary to open the valve at Prettyboy to supply water to Loch Raven. The Prettyboy Reservoir construction had been completed in 1933. The valves remained opened until the spring rains came in 1942. Water quality improved from Prettyboy because of the aeration affect while the water traveled downstream.
1943 – In addition to the water consumption by the war industrial activity and the general population, there was a drought condition throughout summer and fall which in effect set a new daily water consumption record of 165.19 million gallons.
1955 – 1956 – The drought that began in December 1955 ended in February 1956. Liberty Dam (Dam crest elevation 420’) did not relieve effects of the two year drought. Mayor asks for study on scientific rain making.
1965 – By the end of the year, the combined water storage of the three reservoirs was at 36.8% of full capacity. This serious deficiency led to the decision to activate the Susquehanna line as soon as the Susquehanna project was completed. The dedication of the completed Susquehanna project was being scheduled for January 28, 1966.

drought pb 65

Prettyboy drought in 1965.

1966 – Due to the continuing drought conditions, it became necessary by August 1966 to supply water to a part of Harford County via Winter’s Run. The water supply was accomplished by installing an emergency connection to the Susquehanna pipe line; and installing a meter and control valve set to discharge 1 MGD to Winter’s Run. The temporary connection was activated on August 5, 1966 through August 15, 1966. The temporary connection was then dismantled. Because of the low water level in Loch Raven, the low lift pumps at the Montebello Raw Water Distribution Center were operated from January 1, 1966 until February 21, 1966. On January 28, 1966, the Deer Creek Pumping Station was dedicated by Mayor Theodore R. McKeldin. By June 30, due to the drought conditions and water use, the raw water reservoirs were as follows: Liberty – 14.75 feet below crest; Loch Raven Reservoir – 7.2 feet below crest; and, Prettyboy Reservoir – 29.27 feet below crest. On March 28, 1966 the Bureau of Water Supply initiated the Montebello Plants to begin withdrawing 158 MGD of Susquehanna water via Deer Creek Pumping Station in an attempt to halt the decline and firm up the raw water reserves of the Gunpowder and Patapsco. By March 30, 1966 the Philadelphia Electric Company had opened the control gates at the Conowingo dam thereby dropping the water level; and, thereafter the Montebello Plants were restricted to withdrawing only 112 MGD from Susquehanna. On May 25, 1966 the elevation at Loch Raven reached 236.9 feet and pumpage from Susquehanna ceased. On June 10, 1966 one 56 MGD pump at Deer Creek Pumping Station was reactivated when the Loch Raven Reservoir dropped to elevation 234.75 feet. The water level continued to decline at Loch Raven and a second pump at Deer Creek Pumping Station went online on June 22, 1966. On November 16, the Susquehanna water was shut off because the water hardness had reached 200 ppm and the customers had been complaining about the quality of the water. On December 20, 1966 the Montebello Plants began blending 50 MGD of Susquehanna water with Loch Raven water.

Drought LL 1960

The low lift pumps suction well.

Drought Susq 253-D 1963

A section of the Susquehanna pipe line – 36 miles from the river to Baltimore.

Drought DC552-D 1965

The intake structure on the Susquehanna River.

Drought DC670-D

The pumps at Deer Creek. Because of the variation in the elevation of the pipe line, the water will not flow by gravity, so pumps are used.

1968 – On May 30, 1968 all three raw water reservoirs were at overflow elevation for the first time since 1961.
2001 – 2002 – There was a drought during the year. The drop in elevations which had begun in August/September of 2001 continued through the year. Water Management tried to maintain Loch Raven at a certain level once the drought became official. Susquehanna water was required to be blended with the Loch Raven water until the drought was over. By the end of December all three raw water reservoirs were at the following elevations: Loch Raven Reservoir was at about full capacity; Prettyboy Reservoir was down by about 25 feet below full capacity or about 1.5 feet below 50% full; and, Liberty Reservoir was down by about 22.5 feet below full capacity or about 1 foot below 50% full.

Drought LR 02

Loch Raven in 2002

Drought PB 02

Prettyboy in 2002

2007 – Low accumulation of snow during the year and the lack of rain during summer/fall created a strain on the reservoirs towards the end of the year, creating a drought scenario. The Loch Raven Reservoir dropped below full capacity by the end of June, and by the beginning of December was at an elevation of 233.8 feet, about 6.2 feet below full capacity or about 1.3 feet above 75% full. Water Management at this time was trying to balance the elevations between Loch Raven and Prettyboy so that Loch Raven would not overflow while Prettyboy remained significantly low, should the groundwater increased the raw water levels, as had happened in 2002. The Prettyboy Reservoir dropped below full capacity by the end of May and continued dropping for months. By the beginning of December, Prettyboy Reservoir was at an elevation of 497.3 feet, about 23 feet below full capacity or about 0.8 feet above 50% full. The Liberty Reservoir dropped below full capacity by the end of May and continued dropping for the remainder of the year. By the beginning of December, Liberty Reservoir was at an elevation of 407.08 feet, about 13 feet below full capacity or about 3 feet below 75% full. On December 11, 2007 it was planned by Water Management to open the Susquehanna line to relieve the dwindling raw water reservoir levels. The opening of the Susquehanna line was delayed due to the Director’s health and eventual death, which also delayed notification to the public of a pending drought situation and the planned opening of the Susquehanna line. Days later after the death of the Director, the public was notified of the pending drought situation and the Susquehanna water line would be opened on December 18, 2007, first to flush the line of brackish water before blending with Loch Raven raw water.

Drought pb 07

Prettyboy in 2007

Drought pb 07b

Prettyboy in 2007

Note – some of these photos come from the dPW collection, some from people sending to me and some downloaded from US Geological.

Clifton Gate House – new project

21 Thursday Jul 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, HISTORY, Reservoir, water history

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Baltimore, engineering, FILTRATION, Graves, HISTORY, Lake Clifton, POLITICS, Public Works, water, water history

There is a renewed interest in restoring the old Clifton Gate House. I have been invited to another meeting to determine what is to be done with it. I went to one of these meetings a while ago. A farmer wanted to turn it into a weekend farmers market. He said he had $10,000 he was willing to invest in repairs! That wouldn’t cover one small portion of the roof (Spanish tiles are expensive!) An interested party for this meeting is Civic Works. I hope they get the ok to take it over. They are currently restoring the Clifton Mansion in Clifton Park. Former estate of Johns Hopkins. It is a great project being done. I enjoy going on tours there.
The reservoir, piping and gate house were built between the years 1875 and 1888. The tunnel work between the Montebello Reservoir and the Clifton Estate commenced on August 16, 1876. In 1877 it was suggested to construct an additional lake at Clifton. In 1878 the Clifton Tunnel was completed and brick arched. The decision was made by the Water Board to go ahead and create an additional reservoir at Clifton. This work started in 1879. By 1881 the Lake Clifton construction was left unfinished due to lack of funds. The Clifton gate chamber was completed and a wooden shed is built over it to protect the iron work from the weather. Because of lack of funds, work halted on the lake and did not resume until 1884. (Water was sent to the City via the valves under the wooden shed)(Wish I could find a photo of that!)
Work at Lake Clifton progressed satisfactorily during 1887. The tunnel connecting Lake Clifton to Lake Montebello was in thorough working order. The gate-house superstructure is well under way. It is believed that it is advanced enough where water can be let into the Lake during the year 1888.
1888 – Lake Clifton is finally completed and put into service on December 27, 1888. Lake Clifton has a full capacity of 265 million gallons of water. The water area is 30 acres and is 30 feet deep and has the same elevation as Lake Montebello. (The completion stone for the gate house says 1887)

c3

From a postcard, soon after building.

c2

The lake (reservoir) in service and supplying water to the City.

c7

The completion stone 1887.

c1

Interior view a couple years ago.

c6

Neglected roof.

c4

The lake after being drained, to make room for a new school. Graves were found here.

c5

Clifton Mansion being restored by Civic Works. From up in the tower you can see the gate house and the outline of where the lake was.

Other People’s Digital Collections

18 Monday Jul 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, HISTORY, water history

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Baltimore, engineering, glass plate negatives, Gunpowder Falls, HISTORY, Public Works, water history

I learned quite a bit during my History Preservation classes. Most notably, concerning research. The instructor, Eli Pousson, showed us many resources where we could find information and photographs. So I went to one site at a local university (Hughes Collection) and as I normally do, I typed in two keywords in the search box. First, ‘Montebello’ followed by ‘Loch Raven’.  There were about 30 photographs listed, most of which were mislabeled or misleading.

The below photo from the Public Works collection, which is the same as the one in the Hughes Collection, marked as #457 is described as –

LochRaven 8-14 457

Title [Metal bridge at Loch Raven, Baltimore]
Accession Number P75-54-0586g
Photographer Hughes Company
Date Created 1914-08-07
Caption From Sleeve: Greiner and Whitman Bridges. Loch Raven. (15370) -2 negs.
Loch Raven. Aug 7 14
Description Bridge attributed to John Edwin Greiner and Ezra B. Whitman.
Title Note Title supplied by cataloger.
Notes Positive digital file from original glass negative
Measurements 8 x 10 in.
DCMI Type StillImage
Work Type (AAT) photographs
Process black-and-white photographs, gelatin dry plate negatives
Genre documentary photography
Location United States — Maryland — Baltimore
Subject Names (Local) J.E. Greiner Company
Loch Raven Reservoir (Md.)
Subject Names (LCNAF) Greiner, J. E. (John Edwin), b. 1859
Subject (TGM) Truss bridges
Condition Border of black paper. Specks of emulsion chipped all over image. Glass side has fingertip smudges.
Collection Hughes Company Glass Negatives
Credit Line The Photography Collections, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Rights This item may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. It is made available by UMBC for non-commercial research and education. For permission to publish or reproduce, please contact Special Collections at speccoll(at)umbc.edu.
Repository University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)

A couple things that jump out at me are these facts – Greiner and Whitman Bridges: These gentlemen (probably the ones in the photo) were the consulting engineers on the job. The actual builder of the bridge was the Roanoke Bridge Co. It also notes that there are two negatives? I have what I thought was the original negative. Did they photograph a print and make 2 negatives? Also, my plate is cracked and noted as such.

The photo below shows a side view, taken on the same date. The bridge was known as Bridge #1, also called the Yellott Bridge. It was approximately in the same place that the present bridge is – Loch Raven Drive.

LochRaven 8-14 455

Eden Mill Kayaking

14 Thursday Jul 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in HISTORY, Photography, Reservoir, water history

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

eden mill, engineering, Hiking, HISTORY, kayaking, mills, Museum, Public Works, water history

Kathy and I went kayaking on one of the most peaceful creeks I know of – Eden Mill at Deer Creek. Back in July 2013 I posted about History and Photography, that people should appreciate the history of the mills and streams they hike. Since I have just started to kayak, I now have a deeper appreciation of the history of Eden Mill. The perspective is so much different on the water than it is walking the trails.

Additional research has shown that there were a few plans for damming Deer Creek. in July of 2013 I wrote that the crest of the proposed dam at the Rocks would be at an elevation of 540’. Another 1933 study put it at 430’. In either case, if the dam was built, the mill would be under water.

The below topography map shows the creek elevation at 342’. The dam is 16’ tall so that brings us to 358’. The mill is three stories so let’s add roughly another 36’ – that’s 394’. So yes, that is still a good 30 feet underwater! The mill is to the right of the word creek, just past the branch stream.

EM5

To know this and to understand the history makes it such a sweet kayaking adventure. Appreciate history. Go kayaking. Be happy!

EM7

Looking upstream from the base of the mill.

EM6

The Mill as it looked in the 1930s

EM1

The mill and top of dam. View from kayaks.

EM3

One of the branch streams that feeds Deer Creek. These two bridges would be under water.

EM4

View from under the bridge. Back in the 30s, this bridge was probably an old wooden one.

EM2

It doesn’t get any better than this!

Graffiti as History

13 Wednesday Jul 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, HISTORY

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

art, Baltimore, graffiti, HISTORY, Monuments, POLITICS, preservation, Statues

img013a

During last night’s class on Historic Preservation, the topic of graffiti came up for a brief moment. There is apparently two sets of graffiti inside the Washington Monument in downtown Baltimore. Those written in the base of the monument, dating back, possibly to the mid-1800s and that written in the tower, which was most recently done. There is an attempt to figure out and preserve the graffiti in the base, but yet, the graffiti in the tower is vulgar, obscene and must be removed! I posed this question to the group; wouldn’t the tower graffiti be historic in 100 years? A couple people were adamant that this type of graffiti is not historic.

So that got me thinking – who determines this? Who is to say what is vulgar and what is historic? A quick Google search of Roman Graffiti shows many sites with graffiti quotes that the Romans plastered everywhere. Did this graffiti tell a story of the social lives of people? Was Pompeii a den of iniquity? What about cave drawings? Supposed it was found out that these were all sexual in nature? Would they be removed? And petroglyphs? Rock carvings, some of which may be considered animal cruelty. Or are they the tales of various cultures?

I do not condone graffiti. I was once (when I was 17) considering writing a book about it while hitch hiking cross country. I was amazed at the different graffiti scribbled on the bathroom stalls of gas stations. Short stories and quotes about toilet paper (or the lack thereof) and where to get the best sex in town! Did this graffiti describe nomadic living? I’ve seen much graffiti that defaces public spaces and right next to it will be graffiti, renamed as a commissioned art piece. Who determines which of the two are really works of art? I’ve seen a lot of graffiti that were truly works of art. Someone I know went under a bridge, saw graffiti and did a painting of it. It was really good and I tried to buy her original artwork at auction but was outbid by many others.

Exploring Baltimore Heritage 101 Juxtapose

07 Thursday Jul 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, HISTORY

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Baltimore, HISTORY, Public Works, water history

For my class I was asked to do this – Hope it works!

This is the storeroom that was connected to the Eastern Pumping Station. They made fire hydrants and fittings here for the water department. The building is still there.

https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxtapose/latest/embed/index.html?uid=0ccf28da-446d-11e6-8309-0e7075bba956

Montebello Waste Lakes

05 Tuesday Jul 2016

Posted by Ronald Parks in Baltimore, water history

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

aerial, Baltimore, drone, engineering, FILTRATION, Health, HISTORY, Lake Montebello, maps, Montebello, POLITICS, Public Works, water, water history

Yes, there are two waste lakes at Montebello. The large one that people use every day as a park and a smaller one, hidden from view, on the filtration plant property. The large one was at one time (1881-1915) used as drinking water. The small one (1915) has always been used to settle out the waste by-products of the filtration process.

To the dismay of the Filter Engineer, he was forced to allow the Model Yacht Club to use the small lake for their club activities in the late 1930s. Sometimes when he was pissed off, he would drain the lake down. At the start of WWII, for security reasons, the club could no longer use the lake.

wl1939

wl1939b

Because of the amount of water processed and the waste created by this process, the lakes would need dredging. It was a lot easier to dredge the smaller one than to do the big one. Unfortunately, the dredged material would be pumped into the big lake. That one was to be dredged every 30 years. An optimal plan would be to dredge the small lake every five years.

wl1978

In 1978 thru 1984, the small lake was dredged.

wl1984

What was called a “sonic survey” took place in 1984, this was to show the nearby residents what needed to be done to the lakes. Both lakes were partially drained to show the amount of sludge build-up.

wl2003

This is a google map aerial of the lake in 2003. The brown sludge build-up is the overflow from the small lake. (Note that Google Map dates are not always correct)

wl2007

2005-2007 a portion of the small lake was dredged and a little over 1/3 of the big lake. Why? Money constraints. They should have completely dredged both lakes, but consulting engineers and politics dictates what goes on.

wl2010

By 2010 the small waste lake is practically filled, again (to the lower right of the 4 square basins) and it is now flowing into the large lake (Hard to see but it is in the lower right corner)

wl2015

By 2013 the big lake starts filling up rather quickly. The small lake is full

wl2016b

In 2016 it was decided to start dredging the small lake, only partially??

wl2016

The present day dredge cutting a path thru the sludge. The waste lake is about 30 feet deep here. they have only reached 17 feet (Photo courtesy Merrill Bros. drone)

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Blogroll

  • Flouride Action Network
  • lulu
  • My Book
  • WordPress.com
  • WordPress.org

Recent Posts

  • Bermuda 2023
  • ICELAND April 2023
  • George Chalmers of Fochabers
  • In Search of The Skipjack Ada Mae
  • Trap Pond Kayak

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Water and Me
    • Join 231 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Water and Me
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...